Molecule Information
General Information of the Molecule (ID: Mol01184)
Name |
erm(X)cj (Unclear)
,Corynebacterium jeikeium
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molecule Type |
Protein
|
||||
Gene Name |
erm(X)cj
|
||||
Sequence |
MSAYGQGRHEHGQNFLTNHKIINSIIDLVKQTSGPIIEIGPGSGALTHPMAHLGRAITAV
EVDAKLAAKITQETSSAAVEVVHDDFLNFRLPATPCVIVGNIPFHLTTAILRKLLHAPAW TDAVLLMQWEVARRRAGVGATTMMTAQWSPWFTFHLGSRVPRSAFRPQPNVDGGILVIRR VGDPKIPIEQRKAFQAMVHTVFTARGRGIGEILRRQGCFHHVQKHNHGCAREESTPRPYL PDCYTNDWIDLFQVTGSSLPHHRPISPSGSSQRPPQRKNRSRRR Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
Click to Show/Hide the Complete Species Lineage | |||||
Type(s) of Resistant Mechanism of This Molecule
ADTT: Aberration of the Drug's Therapeutic Target
Drug Resistance Data Categorized by Drug
Approved Drug(s)
6 drug(s) in total
Clarithromycin
Drug Resistance Data Categorized by Their Corresponding Mechanisms | ||||
Aberration of the Drug's Therapeutic Target (ADTT) | ||||
Disease Class: Corynebacterium jeikeium infection | [1] | |||
Resistant Disease | Corynebacterium jeikeium infection [ICD-11: 1A00-1C4Z] | |||
Resistant Drug | Clarithromycin | |||
Molecule Alteration | Frameshift mutation | Codon 216 frame shift |
||
Experimental Note | Identified from the Human Clinical Data | |||
In Vitro Model | Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 | 196627 | ||
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 | 1280 | |||
Corynebacterium diphtheriae isolate | 1717 | |||
Corynebacterium glutamicum kO8 | 1718 | |||
Corynebacterium jeikeium isolates | 38289 | |||
Escherichia coli ATCC 25923 | 562 | |||
Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue MRF9 | 562 | |||
Experiment for Molecule Alteration |
Southern blotting assay | |||
Experiment for Drug Resistance |
Disk diffusion methods assay; agar dilution methods assay | |||
Mechanism Description | Abundant amplificationproducts of slightly less than 400 bp were generated from DNAisolated from the 17 MLSb-resistant strains, whereas no am-plification products were generated with the DNA isolatedfrom the three susceptible strains. The DNA sequences of the amplification products showed 95% identity to the erm(X) gene isolated from a C. xerosis strain,erm(X)cx or ermCX. Thus, MLSb resistance in C. jeikeiumis associated with the presence of an allele, erm(X)cj, of the class Xermgenes. The first 215 amino acids of the predicted polypeptides for strains CJ12 and CJ21 are 93.5 and 98.6% identical to Erm(X)cx, the Erm protein from C. xerosi. The major difference between the two Erm(X)cj polypeptides and the Erm(X)cx polypeptide is a frame shift within codon 216. This results in the Erm(X)cj polypeptides being 31 amino acids longer than Erm(X)cx. |
Clindamycin
Drug Resistance Data Categorized by Their Corresponding Mechanisms | ||||
Aberration of the Drug's Therapeutic Target (ADTT) | ||||
Disease Class: Corynebacterium jeikeium infection | [1] | |||
Resistant Disease | Corynebacterium jeikeium infection [ICD-11: 1A00-1C4Z] | |||
Resistant Drug | Clindamycin | |||
Molecule Alteration | Frameshift mutation | Codon 216 frame shift |
||
Experimental Note | Identified from the Human Clinical Data | |||
In Vitro Model | Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 | 196627 | ||
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 | 1280 | |||
Corynebacterium diphtheriae isolate | 1717 | |||
Corynebacterium glutamicum kO8 | 1718 | |||
Corynebacterium jeikeium isolates | 38289 | |||
Escherichia coli ATCC 25923 | 562 | |||
Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue MRF9 | 562 | |||
Experiment for Molecule Alteration |
Southern blotting assay | |||
Experiment for Drug Resistance |
Disk diffusion methods assay; agar dilution methods assay | |||
Mechanism Description | Abundant amplificationproducts of slightly less than 400 bp were generated from DNAisolated from the 17 MLSb-resistant strains, whereas no am-plification products were generated with the DNA isolatedfrom the three susceptible strains. The DNA sequences of the amplification products showed 95% identity to the erm(X) gene isolated from a C. xerosis strain,erm(X)cx or ermCX. Thus, MLSb resistance in C. jeikeiumis associated with the presence of an allele, erm(X)cj, of the class Xermgenes. The first 215 amino acids of the predicted polypeptides for strains CJ12 and CJ21 are 93.5 and 98.6% identical to Erm(X)cx, the Erm protein from C. xerosi. The major difference between the two Erm(X)cj polypeptides and the Erm(X)cx polypeptide is a frame shift within codon 216. This results in the Erm(X)cj polypeptides being 31 amino acids longer than Erm(X)cx. |
Erythromycin
Drug Resistance Data Categorized by Their Corresponding Mechanisms | ||||
Aberration of the Drug's Therapeutic Target (ADTT) | ||||
Disease Class: Corynebacterium jeikeium infection | [1] | |||
Resistant Disease | Corynebacterium jeikeium infection [ICD-11: 1A00-1C4Z] | |||
Resistant Drug | Erythromycin | |||
Molecule Alteration | Frameshift mutation | Codon 216 frame shift |
||
Experimental Note | Identified from the Human Clinical Data | |||
In Vitro Model | Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 | 196627 | ||
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 | 1280 | |||
Corynebacterium diphtheriae isolate | 1717 | |||
Corynebacterium glutamicum kO8 | 1718 | |||
Corynebacterium jeikeium isolates | 38289 | |||
Escherichia coli ATCC 25923 | 562 | |||
Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue MRF9 | 562 | |||
Experiment for Molecule Alteration |
Southern blotting assay | |||
Experiment for Drug Resistance |
Disk diffusion methods assay; agar dilution methods assay | |||
Mechanism Description | Abundant amplificationproducts of slightly less than 400 bp were generated from DNAisolated from the 17 MLSb-resistant strains, whereas no am-plification products were generated with the DNA isolatedfrom the three susceptible strains. The DNA sequences of the amplification products showed 95% identity to the erm(X) gene isolated from a C. xerosis strain,erm(X)cx or ermCX. Thus, MLSb resistance in C. jeikeiumis associated with the presence of an allele, erm(X)cj, of the class Xermgenes. The first 215 amino acids of the predicted polypeptides for strains CJ12 and CJ21 are 93.5 and 98.6% identical to Erm(X)cx, the Erm protein from C. xerosi. The major difference between the two Erm(X)cj polypeptides and the Erm(X)cx polypeptide is a frame shift within codon 216. This results in the Erm(X)cj polypeptides being 31 amino acids longer than Erm(X)cx. |
Kanamycin
Drug Resistance Data Categorized by Their Corresponding Mechanisms | ||||
Aberration of the Drug's Therapeutic Target (ADTT) | ||||
Disease Class: Corynebacterium jeikeium infection | [1] | |||
Resistant Disease | Corynebacterium jeikeium infection [ICD-11: 1A00-1C4Z] | |||
Resistant Drug | Kanamycin | |||
Molecule Alteration | Frameshift mutation | Codon 216 frame shift |
||
Experimental Note | Identified from the Human Clinical Data | |||
In Vitro Model | Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 | 196627 | ||
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 | 1280 | |||
Corynebacterium diphtheriae isolate | 1717 | |||
Corynebacterium glutamicum kO8 | 1718 | |||
Corynebacterium jeikeium isolates | 38289 | |||
Escherichia coli ATCC 25923 | 562 | |||
Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue MRF9 | 562 | |||
Experiment for Molecule Alteration |
Southern blotting assay | |||
Experiment for Drug Resistance |
Disk diffusion methods assay; agar dilution methods assay | |||
Mechanism Description | Abundant amplificationproducts of slightly less than 400 bp were generated from DNAisolated from the 17 MLSb-resistant strains, whereas no am-plification products were generated with the DNA isolatedfrom the three susceptible strains. The DNA sequences of the amplification products showed 95% identity to the erm(X) gene isolated from a C. xerosis strain,erm(X)cx or ermCX. Thus, MLSb resistance in C. jeikeiumis associated with the presence of an allele, erm(X)cj, of the class Xermgenes. The first 215 amino acids of the predicted polypeptides for strains CJ12 and CJ21 are 93.5 and 98.6% identical to Erm(X)cx, the Erm protein from C. xerosi. The major difference between the two Erm(X)cj polypeptides and the Erm(X)cx polypeptide is a frame shift within codon 216. This results in the Erm(X)cj polypeptides being 31 amino acids longer than Erm(X)cx. |
Lincomycin
Drug Resistance Data Categorized by Their Corresponding Mechanisms | ||||
Aberration of the Drug's Therapeutic Target (ADTT) | ||||
Disease Class: Corynebacterium jeikeium infection | [1] | |||
Resistant Disease | Corynebacterium jeikeium infection [ICD-11: 1A00-1C4Z] | |||
Resistant Drug | Lincomycin | |||
Molecule Alteration | Frameshift mutation | Codon 216 frame shift |
||
Experimental Note | Identified from the Human Clinical Data | |||
In Vitro Model | Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 | 196627 | ||
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 | 1280 | |||
Corynebacterium diphtheriae isolate | 1717 | |||
Corynebacterium glutamicum kO8 | 1718 | |||
Corynebacterium jeikeium isolates | 38289 | |||
Escherichia coli ATCC 25923 | 562 | |||
Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue MRF9 | 562 | |||
Experiment for Molecule Alteration |
Southern blotting assay | |||
Experiment for Drug Resistance |
Disk diffusion methods assay; agar dilution methods assay | |||
Mechanism Description | Abundant amplificationproducts of slightly less than 400 bp were generated from DNAisolated from the 17 MLSb-resistant strains, whereas no am-plification products were generated with the DNA isolatedfrom the three susceptible strains. The DNA sequences of the amplification products showed 95% identity to the erm(X) gene isolated from a C. xerosis strain,erm(X)cx or ermCX. Thus, MLSb resistance in C. jeikeiumis associated with the presence of an allele, erm(X)cj, of the class Xermgenes. The first 215 amino acids of the predicted polypeptides for strains CJ12 and CJ21 are 93.5 and 98.6% identical to Erm(X)cx, the Erm protein from C. xerosi. The major difference between the two Erm(X)cj polypeptides and the Erm(X)cx polypeptide is a frame shift within codon 216. This results in the Erm(X)cj polypeptides being 31 amino acids longer than Erm(X)cx. |
Zithromax
Drug Resistance Data Categorized by Their Corresponding Mechanisms | ||||
Aberration of the Drug's Therapeutic Target (ADTT) | ||||
Disease Class: Corynebacterium jeikeium infection | [1] | |||
Resistant Disease | Corynebacterium jeikeium infection [ICD-11: 1A00-1C4Z] | |||
Resistant Drug | Zithromax | |||
Molecule Alteration | Frameshift mutation | Codon 216 frame shift |
||
Experimental Note | Identified from the Human Clinical Data | |||
In Vitro Model | Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 | 196627 | ||
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 | 1280 | |||
Corynebacterium diphtheriae isolate | 1717 | |||
Corynebacterium glutamicum kO8 | 1718 | |||
Corynebacterium jeikeium isolates | 38289 | |||
Escherichia coli ATCC 25923 | 562 | |||
Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue MRF9 | 562 | |||
Experiment for Molecule Alteration |
Southern blotting assay | |||
Experiment for Drug Resistance |
Disk diffusion methods assay; agar dilution methods assay | |||
Mechanism Description | Abundant amplificationproducts of slightly less than 400 bp were generated from DNAisolated from the 17 MLSb-resistant strains, whereas no am-plification products were generated with the DNA isolatedfrom the three susceptible strains. The DNA sequences of the amplification products showed 95% identity to the erm(X) gene isolated from a C. xerosis strain,erm(X)cx or ermCX. Thus, MLSb resistance in C. jeikeiumis associated with the presence of an allele, erm(X)cj, of the class Xermgenes. The first 215 amino acids of the predicted polypeptides for strains CJ12 and CJ21 are 93.5 and 98.6% identical to Erm(X)cx, the Erm protein from C. xerosi. The major difference between the two Erm(X)cj polypeptides and the Erm(X)cx polypeptide is a frame shift within codon 216. This results in the Erm(X)cj polypeptides being 31 amino acids longer than Erm(X)cx. |
References
If you find any error in data or bug in web service, please kindly report it to Dr. Sun and Dr. Zhang.