Drug Information
Drug (ID: DG01747) and It's Reported Resistant Information
| Name |
Encorafenib/Cetuximab
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synonyms |
Encorafenib/Cetuximab
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||
| Drug Resistance Disease(s) |
Disease(s) with Resistance Information Discovered by Cell Line Test for This Drug
(1 diseases)
[1]
|
||||
Type(s) of Resistant Mechanism of This Drug
Drug Resistance Data Categorized by Their Corresponding Diseases
ICD-02: Benign/in-situ/malignant neoplasm
| Drug Resistance Data Categorized by Their Corresponding Mechanisms | ||||
|
|
||||
| Key Molecule: Serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf (BRAF) | [1] | |||
| Resistant Disease | Colorectal cancer [ICD-11: 2B91.1] | |||
| Molecule Alteration | Mutation | Q24K+L28M+R30E+A92K |
||
| Experimental Note | Revealed Based on the Cell Line Data | |||
| Cell Pathway Regulation | EGFR signaling pathway | Inhibition | hsa01521 | |
| In Vitro Model | Colon-26 carcinoma cells | Skin | Homo sapiens (Human) | N.A. |
| Experiment for Molecule Alteration |
TruSight oncology 500 assay | |||
| Experiment for Drug Resistance |
MTS assay | |||
| Mechanism Description | The patient's tumor had concurrent PTEN loss-of-function alteration at diagnosis and PDCs were generated from ascites after resistance to the BRAF/EGFR inhibitor. The PDCs were resistant to the encorafenib-cetuximab combination even at a high concentration of cetuximab (up to 500 ug/mL). Adding the CDK4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, to encorafenib-cetuximab showed a synergistic effect in a proliferation assay. Ribociclib plus encorafenib-cetuximab represented a significantly lower expression of Ki-67 compared to the dual combination alone. An MTS assay showed that triplet therapy with ribociclib, encorafenib, and cetuximab suppressed cell viability more efficiently than the two-drug combinations. Investigating the combined effect of triplet therapy using the calculated combination index (CI) showed that ribociclib had a synergistic effect with encorafenib-cetuximab when applied to PDCs with a concurrent BRAF/PTEN mutation. | |||
| Key Molecule: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) | [1] | |||
| Resistant Disease | Colorectal cancer [ICD-11: 2B91.1] | |||
| Molecule Alteration | Mutation | Q24K/L28M/R30Q/A92K RASs |
||
| Experimental Note | Revealed Based on the Cell Line Data | |||
| Cell Pathway Regulation | EGFR signaling pathway | Inhibition | hsa01521 | |
| In Vitro Model | Colon-26 carcinoma cells | Skin | Homo sapiens (Human) | N.A. |
| Experiment for Molecule Alteration |
TruSight oncology 500 assay | |||
| Experiment for Drug Resistance |
MTS assay | |||
| Mechanism Description | The patient's tumor had concurrent PTEN loss-of-function alteration at diagnosis and PDCs were generated from ascites after resistance to the BRAF/EGFR inhibitor. The PDCs were resistant to the encorafenib-cetuximab combination even at a high concentration of cetuximab (up to 500 ug/mL). Adding the CDK4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, to encorafenib-cetuximab showed a synergistic effect in a proliferation assay. Ribociclib plus encorafenib-cetuximab represented a significantly lower expression of Ki-67 compared to the dual combination alone. An MTS assay showed that triplet therapy with ribociclib, encorafenib, and cetuximab suppressed cell viability more efficiently than the two-drug combinations. Investigating the combined effect of triplet therapy using the calculated combination index (CI) showed that ribociclib had a synergistic effect with encorafenib-cetuximab when applied to PDCs with a concurrent BRAF/PTEN mutation. | |||
| Drug Sensitivity Data Categorized by Their Corresponding Mechanisms | ||||
|
|
||||
| Key Molecule: Serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf (BRAF) | [2] | |||
| Sensitive Disease | Colorectal cancer [ICD-11: 2B91.1] | |||
| Molecule Alteration | Missense mutation | p.V600X (c.1798_1799) |
||
| Experimental Note | Identified from the Human Clinical Data | |||
| Cell Pathway Regulation | MAPK signaling pathway | Inhibition | hsa04010 | |
| Mechanism Description | Concomitant inhibition leads to sustained suppression of MAPK signaling resulting in reduced cell proliferation and increased antitumor activity. | |||
References
If you find any error in data or bug in web service, please kindly report it to Dr. Sun and Dr. Yu.
